-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Asheesh,
I was going to give that a try this weekend or Monday. I would guess that since it is in the tarball, it is all under the same license. Plus there is no clause about its license in the README. I have cc-ed Jonathan Paisly, the author of the patch. Maybe he can confirm this. He may also be able to tell us if he has tested the patch against alpine-1.10. Jonathan, please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have any extra info. Robert Asheesh Laroia wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Pres-Gas wrote: > >> Public bug reported: >> >> Binary package hint: alpine >> >> To catch Alpine up with the other console mail clients, can the s/mime >> patch (/alpine-1.10/contrib/smime/pine-smime-20030115.diff). Possibly >> make a separate package called "alpine-smime"? > > I will try this in about a week. For now, are you interested in tring to > apply that patch to the package and rebuilding it, and seeing if that > works? > > (Is that patch Free Software?) > > -- Asheesh. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFInFL7up357T5MfTYRAm37AJ9anAe9V/H7YXwc9lvTXD95SLxj4ACeP/Ud XQIweX07yyIsUo8kigudWFo= =iNue -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Implement S/MIME capabilities in Alpine package - willing to test. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
