Edward: Section 49 notices are supposed to be served where there is
already a reasonable suspicion (ie other evidence) of the key's
existence (or the knowledge of a passphrase).

This is not a bug, this is political activism trying to use an entire userbase 
as leverage against a law some people disagree with. As it happens I find the 
law highly repugnant when I think of my own private data being rifled through ( 
when I conduct a thought experiment involving the animal rights activists whom 
S49's have already been served on, I have to admit that I find it less 
repugnant than I do those activists, but this is irrelevant). 
Either way, I don't want my sister's Ubuntu laptop and her freedom being part 
of my defence against such a law, and I highly doubt she would appreciate being 
put in that situation without knowledge of it. If the installer did have an 
option to not create this crypto area, it would need to explain what it means 
and why you might want to choose that option - and all sensible people would 
indeed choose not to take part in a probably futile act of disobedience.

Let us be quite clear here - RIPA is now about systematic trawling of people's 
private data, it is a law designed to provide law enforcement agencies with 
tools to do their work. A section 49 notice must be approved by a senior figure 
and there is a tribunal where such notices can be appealed. If you are involved 
in something which convinces these people that you have encrypted data, and you 
are not exceptionally skilled at countering signals intelligence, they are very 
likely to be able to produce evidence that you have been actively using the 
encryption (dimitris' comment above mentions a few of the many, many ways this 
would be possible), and your "but but all these other laptops have the noise 
too!" argument is rendered useless.
If you do find yourself in a situation where your government is systematically 
trawling people's private data then you probably have significantly bigger 
problems than your encrypted bank data being read by a spook.

Please do attempt to get the law repealed, but please do not endanger your 
fellow users by doing so.
I think I have said everything I wish to about this subject, but I am sure that 
more people will call me "Mr Jones" and suggest I am made of straw. I submit 
that these people are well meaning, but excessively paranoid and their 
motivations would be better used in other ways.

-- 
General "rubberhose" vulnerability
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to