I have some confusion about the module source code.

First, if you go to the qc-usb CVS sourceforge repository, they have two 
directories: one is 'qc-usb', the other is 'quickam'.
The patch proposed by Simon applies for the file which is in the 'qc-usb' 
directory. Maybe the same patch should be applied to the quickam.c file in the 
quickam directory?

Btw, the CVS repository says that the quickam directory is 5yo, while
the qc-usb is 2yo. Is this driver still supported? Or will this patch
remain specific to ubuntu?

Second, there's an spca5xx driver, which seems to me to be newer. If it
supports quickcam express, and correctly handles v4l/hal, we may think
about making this module the default quickcam express module, instead of
the current one.

Finally, I believe that no specific fdi file for quickcam should be
created, if it is possible to handle everything within the driver.

To sum up:
- The freedesktop hal bug (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14809) 
shall probably be closed. (if we can handle it in the driver, then hal is not 
affected)
- The cheese bug (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531835) shall be 
marked as duplicate of this bug
- Then we may either patch the current quickcam driver, or test the spca5xx 
driver, and, if it works, make it the default driver

I'm going to test the spca5xx driver, and let you know.

-- 
hal does not detect Quickcam Express as v4l-device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196811
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to