the comment was not especially about your contribution but a note for the people ranting on this bug, your comment upstream is mostly constructive though nobody claims to know better, whoever is writting the software is just free to take the choice he wants for his code and being agressive to convince him to change is not really good.
I've to admit I also have difficulties to get why users go in flame mode for such a detail, clicking on the icon is not that hard, is it? you do it to display the dialog again anyway. having a gconf value to change would probably reduce the discussion, it would make the rhythmbox behaviour inconsistent between installations though and not especially a good move, would be better to have a common behaviour in GNOME rather -- Window close should close, not quit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
