Scott Kitterman wrote: > I'm away from my computer today. Once I'm in a position to do so, I'll do > some research on how we got to this position so I can explain the process. > If there are patches that would get the current Ubuntu package from not > working to working there is a process to do that. > Many thanks for this. If you still want to stick with the ancient version, there is a patch that can be applied to make it work. It all worked fine when I released it, however libraries and perl modules have moved on in the intervening time, and so this old code no longer works.
Thanks! Jules -- Julian Field MEng MBCS CITP CEng [EMAIL PROTECTED] Teaching Systems Manager Electronics & Computer Science University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654 PGP public key: http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- [FFe] Please sync mailscanner 4.66.5-2 from Debian(Unstable) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204546 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
