I have a question regarding the debian package. In the control file,
there is the following entry for the libgdamm3.0-10 binary package:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package: libgdamm3.0-10
Architecture: any
Conflicts: libgdamm3.0-8,
libgdamm-3.0-8,
libgdamm3.0-9
Replaces: libgdamm3.0-8,
libgdamm-3.0-8,
libgdamm3.0-9
Depends: ${misc:Depends},
${shlibs:Depends}
Description: C++ wrappers for libgda3
libgdamm is a set of C++ bindings for the libgda3 database API.
libgda is the GNU Data Access library.
.
This package contains the shared library.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the discussion above (StefanPotyra et. al.), I was under the
impression that there should not be conflicts/replaces fields for a
library package with a soname bump since it might lead to breakage.
What am I missing?
libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2 was uploaded yesterday. So the problems
with the conflicts/replaces fields for the -dev and -doc binary packages
has been corrected. However, having the stable release of the library
is probably a good idea.
--
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
