** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: displayconfig-gtk
  
  Where possible, displayconfig-gtk should generate an xorg.conf file that
  uses RandR 1.2 rather than the older xinerama server code, as it makes
  better use of the card's features (e.g. sharing a single framebuffer for
  multiple monitors), and allows runtime reconfiguration of the displays.
  
  There is some information on configuring an initial RandR 1.2 layout
  available on the Intel Linux Graphics website:
  
      http://www.intellinuxgraphics.org/dualhead.html
  
  The instructions there worked when configuring dual head on my Radeon
  9200SE, modulo different naming of the outputs.  To configure the
  "DVI-0" and "VGA-0" outputs on my system, I used the following
  configuration fragment:
  
    Section "Device"
            Identifier      "ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE]"
            Driver          "ati"
            BusID           "PCI:1:0:0"
            Option          "monitor-DVI-0" "Sony SDM-S74 [1]"
            Option          "monitor-VGA-0" "Sony SDM-S74 [2]"
    EndSection
  
    Section "Monitor"
            Identifier      "Sony SDM-S74 [1]"
            Option          "DPMS"
            HorizSync       30-65
            VertRefresh     50-75
            Option          "LeftOf"        "Sony SDM-S74 [2]"
    EndSection
  
    Section "Monitor"
            Identifier      "Sony SDM-S74 [2]"
            Option          "DPMS"
            HorizSync       30-65
            VertRefresh     50-75
    EndSection
  
    Section "Screen"
            Identifier      "Default Screen"
            Device          "ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE]"
            Monitor         "Sony SDM-S74 [1]"
            DefaultDepth    16
            SubSection "Display"
                    Modes           "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
                    Virtual         2560 1024
            EndSubSection
    EndSection
  
  One quirk I noticed was that I could not specify the position of the
  VGA-0 monitor relative to the DVI-0 monitor -- I needed to do the
  opposite.  From a look at the "xrandr" command line tool output, this is
  probably because the VGA-0 output is the first one, and they set up the
  outputs in order so it doesn't know how to process the positioning
  option.
+ 
+ ---
+ 
+ GNOME control center folks have said they prefer a C-based solution to
+ this, so rather than add xrandr to displayconfig-gtk, they suggested
+ merging efforts with Soren's work.

** Summary changed:

- displayconfig-gtk should generate an randr 1.2 configuration where possible
+ GUI screen config tool should generate an randr 1.2 configuration where 
possible

-- 
GUI screen config tool should generate an randr 1.2 configuration where possible
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to