Thanks very much for your support. I just gave up fighting city hall and distribute my own debian with bltwish in it.
IMO if you arbitrarily pull something out of a standard distributed package that developers and/or users expect to be there, you broke it. In this case I can't see what harm it would do to keep the lousy thing in there. synchrotron wrote: > Though I agree this is not a bug, the absence of bltwish is a major > problem for many that use scripts made by others. The lack of bltwish > in Ubuntu breaks function when assumptions are made. > > -- > bltsh bltsh24 bltwish bltwish24 are all absent > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19148 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- bltsh bltsh24 bltwish bltwish24 are all absent https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
