I think there is a good reason that they are not using bootlogd by
default. I think I read somewhere that bootlogd is quite buggy on some
systems, and it is hard to make it work correctly the way it is
designed. So the proper fix in the long run would be to redesign it
completely, as Scott is intending to do with logd in the future. I don't
remember where I read this however... Probably tekknokrat ran into one
of those problems.

You may try the original 2.86 version, it may work better?

-- 
logd not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to