NEW queue - package namespace - seems safe - licenses are all mentioned in LICENSES and d/copyright - Ensuring correct component based on license => universe - n/a for checks in regard to - Debian state - as it is not in Debian - not targeted at stable releases - expected binaries arch:all python3-regress-stack and that is all there is (LGTM)
General sponsoring - First of all, all of my first pass last week is really in AFAICS. - I see you have spread the license ask asked (to avoid issues with single file copies) - I had one simple find of a source not mentioning, fixed already - it is OK that the debian/* and the .* files do not have further headers - Strictly speaking it should be GPLv3 not apache2.0, we discussed and this will be re-done to GPLv3 - I agree to the purpose of a package that one can use to verify openstack - and I like that you converted the very same into autopkgtest reverse dependency tests - I can't speak for the python in the upstream much, but the team and James would have had you on that - I also asked to fold all changes of the first real ubuntu upload into one which was done immediately - d/rules is clean - uses dh_python and expansions - source build leaves no traces other than d/files - the upstream project was re-hosted to a company space - nothing shocking in d/control I've proposed overrriding no-manpage and a bug reference int he changelog in https://github.com/canonical/regress-stack/pull/34 Builds are working fine on the PPA and in sbuild. This is ready to be accepted. ... one last test build ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103443 Title: [FFE] upload Regress-Stack to plucky To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/regress-stack/+bug/2103443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
