I am skeptical about this bug. There is a very long list of packages that no longer build on 32-bit architectures, much longer than attached to this bug. And I don't think Launchpad copes well with bugs with extremely long lists of affected packages.
You wrote "Long-term, we should either enable support for armhf, or disable the build on armhf entirely." But a Build-Depends on architecture-is-64-bit like gutenprint had is disabling the build on armhf entirely. gutenprint was a very special case where the plan was to re-enable support for armhf after Debian Trixie's release but before Ubuntu 26.04 LTS's release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099865 Title: FTBFS on armhf in the release pocket To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abyss/+bug/2099865/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
