We do periodic toolchain updates like this one here, so essentially it's
not wrong to request this. However I do agree with Simon and I'd prefer
the llvm packages to be built in a clean, security-only PPA so that we
can do a binary copy to -proposed. For both series these will be
essentially NEW packages, but I would still prefer them to appear in
both -updates and -security, due to their nature (and the nature of
packages that could depend on them).

In general this can go through -proposed (for more exposure and
testing), but with the idea in mind that this will go to -security. So,
as mentioned above, we'd need to have it built in a PPA with only
security enabled - and then synced from that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075477

Title:
  SRU: Backport LLVM 18.1.8 to Ubuntu LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-18/+bug/2075477/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to