We do periodic toolchain updates like this one here, so essentially it's not wrong to request this. However I do agree with Simon and I'd prefer the llvm packages to be built in a clean, security-only PPA so that we can do a binary copy to -proposed. For both series these will be essentially NEW packages, but I would still prefer them to appear in both -updates and -security, due to their nature (and the nature of packages that could depend on them).
In general this can go through -proposed (for more exposure and testing), but with the idea in mind that this will go to -security. So, as mentioned above, we'd need to have it built in a PPA with only security enabled - and then synced from that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075477 Title: SRU: Backport LLVM 18.1.8 to Ubuntu LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-18/+bug/2075477/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs