Hi Mauricio, While some of your remarks are expected for an SRU review (SRU template, DEP-3, versioning, arguably changelog formatting), I'm bumping hard on the points 3 and 5. AFAIK those are a matter of preference and tooling, and I have never come across any policy documentation mentioning either of those items.
It's fairly common to edit big series files by hand, in which case empty lines really help to structure that file. This is the first time I've seen someone complain about them! If a package's patch set is maintained using gbp pq, it's natural to use subdirectories rather than plain file prefixes. I myself don't use that tool too often but still favour subdirs because, well, I find them more manageable long-term. If this is documented, consensual policy then I'm reluctantly OK with changing my ways, but otherwise, could you please distinguish those cosmetic preferences from actual hard requirements? Otherwise it makes it unnecessarily hard for people that are still learning packaging. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069821 Title: [VROC] [Ub 24.04] mdadm: buffer overflow detected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/2069821/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
