Benchmarks can be found nicely formatted on https://github.com/bdrung/apport/blob/benchmark-databases/Benchmark.md
SQLite is the fastest on a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W and the only contender for fixing this bug. For the different SQLite implementation variants: You can trade creation time with saved disk space. Since I was too curious I spend some nights on rewriting those SQLite benchmarks in Rust (see https://github.com/bdrung/apport-rs). The Rust implementation is obviously faster. Surprisingly the creation time for the different database layouts is nearly the same. So I conclude that increased creation times in Python are caused by the Python code (and not by the more complex SQL statements). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073787 Title: apport-retrace needs more than 1 GB memory (when using sandbox) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/2073787/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
