Shouldn't we fix how suseconds_t is defined in glibc in the 64-bit time case? It's not as if any interfaces in glibc use suseconds_t other than as part of struct timeval (though we should still warn in NEWS about potential compatibility issues for any interfaces using suseconds_t in third-party libraries).
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055837 Title: Wrong type for timeval.tv_usec on armhf/Noble (and other failures) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/2055837/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
