I was not able to test it on Ubuntu because I don't have armhf hardware,
but I have just tested it on a Debian porterbox. The only difference
between Debian bookworm and sid versions of Qt is presence of this
patch.
I used this test code and complied it with qmake && make.
mitya57@harris:~/test$ cat test.pro
CONFIG += debug warn_all
QT = core network
SOURCES = test.cpp
mitya57@harris:~/test$ cat test.cpp
#include <QtCore/QCoreApplication>
#include <QtCore/QDebug>
#include <QtNetwork/QSslConfiguration>
#include <QtNetwork/QSslSocket>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
QCoreApplication app(argc, argv);
QSslSocket s;
QSslConfiguration cfg = s.sslConfiguration();
cfg.setProtocol(QSsl::TlsV1_3OrLater);
s.setSslConfiguration(cfg);
s.connectToHostEncrypted("www.ubuntu.com", 443);
s.waitForConnected();
qDebug() << s.sessionProtocol();
return 0;
}
Without patch:
(bookworm_armhf-dchroot)mitya57@harris:~/test$ ./test
-1
With patch:
(sid_armhf-dchroot)mitya57@harris:~/test$ ./test
15
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981807
Title:
qt5-network openssl3 armhf does not support tls1.3
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1981807/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
