Hi, Guilherme. I think you misunderstood and we are in agreement. What I mean by the first point is that, on Focal, we need to support 5.4 and 5.15. I don't even think we need to support 5.8 and 5.11 any longer, though 5.13, as it will still be supported for a while needs supporting. But I also mean that we should support not only 5.4.0-113 and 5.4.0-114 (versions on -updates and -proposed), we should also support older 5.4 versions (one could argue all the versions that are still livepatchable at least). I don't think the risk of regressions is big here, but it exists. We ought to balance that risk and how much we can test.
About the second point, it's just an argument that we should not restrict ourselves to the upstream major makedumpfile version that is in LTS+1. Take focal, which will receive 5.15 from jammy. It may require a newer makedumpfile than the one in Jammy because the one in Jammy may not be sufficient to support 5.15. Cascardo. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970672 Title: makedumpfile falls back to cp with "__vtop4_x86_64: Can't get a valid pmd_pte." To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedumpfile/+bug/1970672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
