I agree entirely with Peter on this. By not including a skeleton
/etc/default/grub or not mentioning the file in the standard
documentation, you guys are strongly breaking the principle of least
surprise.
To date, I think this is the only case of a program I have encountered
on a Debian-based system that can use something under
/etc/default/${PROGRAM} without having it be documented nor having a
skeleton file.
Attached is a debdiff patch.
** Attachment added: "Patch to the source package."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11091521/grub-default.patch
--
no way to configure update-grub not to set 'quiet' option in menu.lst
non-recovery stanzas
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
