The decision was taken based on community feedback to keep i386 around
for binary compatibility.
That includes compatibility with i386-only packages in the Ubuntu
archive itself, for which ports to other architectures are not
forthcoming.
Given that inkscape is building fine on i386, I don't see any reason
that would prompt reconsidering this for the packages in question. We
continue to get the expected benefits of a reduced i386 architecture,
with respect to builder capacity and development throughput. Trimming 2
more packages is inconsequential.
If you stil think it's important to remove inkscape on i386, please
bring this up for discussion in a broader forum (either ubuntu-devel
mailing list or the Ubuntu discourse).
** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945855
Title:
Please remove inkscape from the i386 whitelist
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1945855/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
