Yeah that is the mentioned workaround that we have identified before
wrapped up nicely for consumption. Still - like many others - I'd want
to understand the problem :-)

And BTW I wanted to mention a lot of thanks to everyone participating so far!
It makes me feel proud of our user community to work together constructively 
until we find it.

And another BTW we need to be careful as I think we might have at least one or
two other cases here on the bug that might look like the same symptom but
have different reasons. So if/once we apply that change some (with other root
causes) might say "still not working for me" but those we'd then need to fork
out into other bugs to track down their individual root causes.

I have no sssd setup around but will ask someone for help on that.
Thanks for this new opportunity to this.

And even if the sssd approach fails, I think despite still not being able to 
recreate it there
are by now enough people hit and fixed by adding the dgram rule that we have 
together
come up. The libvirtd profile itself is after all meant to be very lenient (not
the guests, but the host service). So by now it might be fair to at least 
propose that even IF I can't reproduce still.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890858

Title:
  AppArmor profile causes QEMU/KVM - Not Connected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1890858/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to