Thanks for your report. It seems to be an offshoot from <https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/20924>.
Please note that the fonts-noto packaging happens at Debian, so Debian is a more proper place to bring up this discussion. I see the old bug <https://bugs.debian.org/756456>. Actually, the fonts- noto package is a meta package which pulls a bunch of binaries: $ apt depends fonts-noto fonts-noto Depends: fonts-noto-core Recommends: fonts-noto-cjk Recommends: fonts-noto-cjk-extra Recommends: fonts-noto-color-emoji Recommends: fonts-noto-extra Recommends: fonts-noto-mono Recommends: fonts-noto-ui-core Recommends: fonts-noto-ui-extra Recommends: fonts-noto-unhinted But since your request is about splitting fonts-noto-core further, I don't think the old Debian bug applies, so you'd better submit a new one. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #756456 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756456 ** Changed in: fonts-noto (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916319 Title: Excessive number of disparate fonts bundled together To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto/+bug/1916319/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
