Hi @Corey, (Ignore my comments as I've managed to setup a cluster without needing ceph-deploy).
I have installed the packages and setup a cluster. The cluster was functional and found no issues with the Groovy packages in my tests. I have done some of the Ceph's benchmarks [0] using the Ceph cluster. Also did some separate tests on rocksdb with and without those flags. Overall, the Ceph Cluster tests which were mainly focusing on I/O didn't show anything out of the ordinary. But the rocksdb benchmarks [1] [2] showed that the optimized build works better in most cases. Besides, we already that this has already been enabled in Ceph upstream as you know -- which we'll get in the future releases. So I am positive that there are no cause for concern with these packages that you've built for Groovy. [0] https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/Benchmark_Ceph_Cluster_Performance [1] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Read-Modify-Write-Benchmarks [2] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/RocksDB-In-Memory-Workload-Performance-Benchmarks ** Attachment added: "rocksdb benchmarks.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5415020/+files/rocksdb%20benchmarks.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453 Title: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
