> Is it possible that any Ubuntu users consume libsejda-java directly, and thus would be regressed by bumping it to to the 1.1 spec?
Thanks for catching this. I updated the regression to include: Ubuntu users consuming libsejda-java directly can regress if something else in their dependency chain currently relies on spec 1.0 - they would need to update these dependencies to also use spec 1.1. I don't know how I could/should evaluate how bad this is compared to having a non-working package such as pdfsam, so I would appreciate any feedback related to the SRU process on such decisions (maybe just having the regressions described is good enough?). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887142 Title: pdfsam won't run, has missing and conflicting dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libhibernate-validator-java/+bug/1887142/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
