> you could give it a try on focal right? Yes, I can and I will.
> I'm still unsure what we should do about this bug 1890881 then without > having an isolated fix, but one step at a time ... I had a similar feeling: After seeing #LP1886811 fixed in upstream QEMU, "systemd-nspawn -b" started fine on some architectures and failed on others with self-compiled QEMU binaries. But failing architectures were not used in my job, I did not file a but report... By the way, QEMU 5.1.0 was released. https://download.qemu.org/qemu-5.1.0.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890881 Title: qemu-user-static 1:5.0-5ubuntu4 in groovy does not start armhf container To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1890881/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs