The difference is in the includes:

Good:
grep -Hrn __NR_semtimedop *
asm-generic/unistd.h:539:#define __NR_semtimedop 192
asm-generic/unistd.h:540:__SC_COMP(__NR_semtimedop, sys_semtimedop, 
compat_sys_semtimedop)
s390x-linux-gnu/bits/syscall.h:1782:#ifdef __NR_semtimedop
s390x-linux-gnu/bits/syscall.h:1783:# define SYS_semtimedop __NR_semtimedop

Bad:
# grep -Hrn __NR_semtimedop *
asm-generic/unistd.h:571:#define __NR_semtimedop 192
asm-generic/unistd.h:572:__SC_3264(__NR_semtimedop, sys_semtimedop_time32, 
sys_semtimedop)
>>>  s390x-linux-gnu/asm/unistd_64.h:336:#define __NR_semtimedop 392
s390x-linux-gnu/bits/syscall.h:1894:#ifdef __NR_semtimedop
s390x-linux-gnu/bits/syscall.h:1895:# define SYS_semtimedop __NR_semtimedop

That is from Package: linux-libc-dev:s390x
Which is from source "linux" so the kernel I'd think then.

Good: 5.0.0-32.34
Bad: 5.3.0-19.20

Hmm, a kernel change then?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849785

Title:
  FTBFS on i386/ppc64/s390x (Eoan+Focal)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1849785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to