That was tested on 4.15, which is the default kernel in ubuntu 18.04. When tested on 5.3rc4, without dptfxtract seems to be good enough [1], although after using dptfxtract, the system is more consistent [2]. So do you suggest users to always have dptfxtract installed? It shouldn't make the system perform worse, am I right?
[1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sSZe2gqfM8NWqaDyUfXx-Q2iGUkKvrREjJsobHfIZiQ/edit#gid=1910979586 [2] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sSZe2gqfM8NWqaDyUfXx-Q2iGUkKvrREjJsobHfIZiQ/edit#gid=907221455 On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:56 AM Srinivas Pandruvada < srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Correct. > I think you are using with 5.3 kernel or using workaround option. > Without dptfxtract output or user manually created thermal-conf.xml or > using aurogenerated, this is risky to play with power as the skin will > hit limit. > > Thanks, > Srinivas > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811730 Title: Thermald does not set max CPU after reseting the voltage using RAPL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1811730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
