Hi thank you for the report Antonio (and also jbarrick for the work
upstream)..

Odd that inifnity doesn't do what one would think, ...


Reverse (for already released distributions) I'm not so sure we should do this 
as it is:
a) it would be a behavioral change that one might not expect e.g. relying on 
that limit (unlikely but possible (you can't imagine how many 
https://xkcd.com/1172/ there are out there)
b) a drop in override by an admin can fix it if one wants the newer limit 
because he is affected

Going forward that seems to make sense thou.
Unfortunately the change - even being from April - only seems to be in 
v1.3.0-beta.0.
We are already on 1.2.7 which released in June, but it didn't make it in there 
:-/
The fix itself [1] is obviously minimal and can be added.

I haven't touched containerd too much yet, so I'd want to see someone
elses opinion as well before doing an upload

[1]: https://github.com/containerd/containerd.git

** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: containerd (Ubuntu Disco)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: containerd (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu Bionic)
       Status: New => Won't Fix

** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu Disco)
       Status: New => Won't Fix

** Tags added: server-next

** Tags added: server-triage-discuss

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839445

Title:
  systemd's service unit should set LimitNOFILE to 1048576

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1839445/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to