On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:19 PM Ryan Harper <ryan.har...@canonical.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:01 AM Andrea Righi <andrea.ri...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Ryan, I've uploaded a new test kernel with the fix mentioned in the >> comment before: >> >> https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~arighi/LP-1796292/4.15.0-56.62~lp1796292+4/ >> >> I've performed over 100 installations using curtin-nvme.sh >> (install_count = 100), no hung task timeout. I'll run other stress tests >> to make sure we're not breaking anything else with this fix, but results >> look promising so far. >> >> It'd be great if you could also do a test on your side. Thanks! >> > > Thats excellent news. I'm starting my tests on this kernel now. > I've got 233 consecutive installs successful. > > >> >> -- >> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug >> report. >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796292 >> >> Title: >> Tight timeout for bcache removal causes spurious failures >> >> To manage notifications about this bug go to: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1796292/+subscriptions >> > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796292 Title: Tight timeout for bcache removal causes spurious failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1796292/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
