$ dig phspi05.phs

; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.5-Ubuntu <<>> phspi05.phs
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 61787
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 65494
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;phspi05.phs.                   IN      A

;; Query time: 29 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.53#53(127.0.0.53)
;; WHEN: Wed Apr 17 10:08:48 BST 2019
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 40

$ dig phspi05.phs @192.168.2.1

; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.5-Ubuntu <<>> phspi05.phs @192.168.2.1
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 21263
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;phspi05.phs.                   IN      A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.                       3600    IN      SOA     a.root-servers.net. 
nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2019041700 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 20 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.2.1#53(192.168.2.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Apr 17 10:10:11 BST 2019
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 115

Hmm... so that is curious... this is making me think, so I have another local 
host specified on the router DNS, but it is specified with then host and local 
domain, i.e. on the router I have:
sjr05x 192.168.2.20
sjr05x.phs 192.168.2.20

And dig results:
$ dig sjr05x

; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.5-Ubuntu <<>> sjr05x
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 15618
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 65494
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;sjr05x.                                IN      A

;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.53#53(127.0.0.53)
;; WHEN: Wed Apr 17 10:15:06 BST 2019
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 35

$ dig sjr05x @192.168.2.1
;; Warning: Message parser reports malformed message packet.

; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.5-Ubuntu <<>> sjr05x @192.168.2.1
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 25027
;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
; COOKIE: ddfb8b62c3075f35 (echoed)
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;sjr05x.                                IN      A

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
sjr05x.                 199150  IN      A       192.168.2.20

;; Query time: 7 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.2.1#53(192.168.2.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Apr 17 10:19:32 BST 2019
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 63

$ dig sjr05x.phs

; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.5-Ubuntu <<>> sjr05x.phs
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4826
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 65494
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;sjr05x.phs.                    IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
sjr05x.phs.             6899    IN      A       192.168.2.20

;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.53#53(127.0.0.53)
;; WHEN: Wed Apr 17 10:20:16 BST 2019
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55

$ dig sjr05x.phs @192.168.2.1
;; Warning: Message parser reports malformed message packet.

; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.5-Ubuntu <<>> sjr05x.phs @192.168.2.1
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 52715
;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
; COOKIE: b088880c84bd6596 (echoed)
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;sjr05x.phs.                    IN      A

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
sjr05x.phs.             199217  IN      A       192.168.2.20

;; Query time: 5 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.2.1#53(192.168.2.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Apr 17 10:20:39 BST 2019
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 67

So is it perhaps that my naive expectation that without a domain the
host is assumed to be local is not consistently followed by different
programs/devices?

Also I now realise that my laptop doesn't know what domain it is part of:
$ domainname
(none)

but then neither does my desktop where the lookups work (not using
networkmanager), and explicitly setting it seems to have no effect.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821491

Title:
  DNS lookup fails for local hosts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1821491/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to