Ionna, Let's then request the SRU verification team to drop the package for trusty-proposed. If SASL is not supported in the Trusty pkg, there is no point to complete the SRU for Trusty.
Additionally, since Trusty is near to its EOL, I don't see good reason/justification to justify the effort/work to enable SASL on the package. Also enabling SASL, IMHO, won't be consider a "bug fix", but a "new feature". For all the reasons above, let's simply drop the pkg from trusty- proposed. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573594 Title: Missing null termination in PROTOCOL_BINARY_CMD_SASL_LIST_MECHS response handling To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmemcached/+bug/1573594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
