They both sound awfully "generic" (pun intended), but I can't really
come up with an example for a bad match, so lets just try it I guess.

That said, isn't the "deeper" problem that these metapackages can be
removed easily even through they are important to keep the kernel up-to-
date (and hence secure). Perhaps some should be "Important:yes"…

For the record: apts behavior is different depending on if you
explicitly remove a metapackage vs. its removed as part of problem
resolution like in a dist-upgrade or if you remove some dependee. Only
in the later cases the manual bit is applied to the (other) dependencies
of the metapackage.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787460

Title:
  Unattended upgrades removed linux-image-generic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1787460/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to