My testing of these updates has been in 2 stages. 1) 2 weeks ago, shortly after tarball release by KDE, I built the testing packages in our staging PPAs and upgrades my primary system and a VM to them.
2) Once uploaded to -proposed I ppa-purge'd the ppa builds and upgraded to the candidate packages. I am aware that (2) is the crucial part, but mention (1) as that significantly increases my confidence in the code changes/fixes. For specific fixes mentioned in the changelogs that I could replicate the issue involved, I verified that that fix did indeed do as advertised. For other packages where changes are more subtle (translation updates etc) I observed no regressions in the normal behaviour that I would expect, either in specific functions that I use where identifiable, or more generally where packages are more part of the whole desktop and desktop shell integration. As a Kubuntu developer I am currently happy enough to support these updates being pushed to users. I would note that plasma-discover has a 5.12.5.1 extra point update additional bugfixes that did not make it into 5.12.5, but I will either wait to put that through as a separate SRU, or should this one take longer update the package version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768245 Title: SRU tracking bug for KDE's Plasma 5.12.5 for bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluedevil/+bug/1768245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
