------- Comment From kla...@br.ibm.com 2018-04-21 09:21 EDT-------
Should we go back to the stock Ubuntu kernel in an attempt to identify if bug 
167104 is a result of the custom kernel or the newest PNOR?

------- Comment From prad...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-21 13:17 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #106)
> Should we go back to the stock Ubuntu kernel in an attempt to identify if
> bug 167104 is a result of the custom kernel or the newest PNOR?

I am looking at all these plethora of bugs on the host and guest, seems
like a constantly shifting problem. I don't think that this particular
instance was because of the custom kernel (reverting some Qlogic
patches). In my opinion memory corruption seems to be gaining currency.

Are systems without the Qlogic adapters seeing any of the problems
reported here?

How do we debug with constantly moving pieces? Can we get a stable base
to start with? By that I mean we go back to a kernel and pnor that
worked in the past. Then using the same kernel advance the pnor and
validate how it works. We might need to limit the testing to "cater" to
the various bugs.

Once we have isolated the pnor, then we repeat with the kernels. Not
sure how long these activities will take, but we might need to consider
running a parallel exercise.

------- Comment From dnban...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-21 14:17 EDT-------
boslcp3 seems to have gone off the rails again ... the console is spitting out a
lot of messages like:

[   ***] (2 of 2) A start job is running for?urnal Service

and it is not pingable....

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762844

Title:
  ISST-LTE:KVM:Ubuntu1804:BostonLC:boslcp3: Host crashed & enters into
  xmon after moving to 4.15.0-15.16 kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1762844/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to