Thats not the point, the point is if it will break apt. I'm particularly concerned about the stunnel and stunnel4 each one replacing the other. It seems to me that stunnel was removed from the debian archive, and its now replaced by a transitional package which is generated by the stunnel4 source package.
Can you check this? Eventually we can sync this, but I believe we need to remove at the same time stunnel 2:3.26-dfsg-2ubuntu1 from hardy. Can you also tell us why stunnel4 was patched to provide and replace crywrap? I assume we can drop this anyhow as there is no crywrap neither in hardy nor in gutsy. -- Please sync stunnel4 3:4.20-5 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157095 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
