Public bug reported: strongswan-starter and openswan both share the file /usr/sbin/ipsec however there is no Conflicts relationship
openswan was deprecated in utopic, so trusty installations may wish to migrate to strongswan ahead of a xenial upgrade. In that case, the package upgrade can fail. This was previously fixed upstream in Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740808 For apt operation ordering reasons I don't understand, the issue only appears when something else on the system (such as neutron-vpn-agent) depends on (strongswan | openswan). Just installing strongswan and replacing it with openswan or vica-versa doesn't cause the issue to trigger. To reproduce the issue on a trusty machine: add-apt-repository cloud-archive:mitaka # the trusty version of neutron-vpn-agent does not have the dependency on openswan | strongswan apt update apt install neutron-vpn-agent openswan # you can answer no to X509 generation apt install strongswan The Conflicts already exists in xenial through bionic, just not in trusty. So the upload would only be required in trusty. ** Affects: strongswan (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: strongswan (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755693 Title: strongswan-starter should conflict with openswan due to shared file /usr/sbin/ipsec To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1755693/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs