On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 23:13 +0000, Richard Green wrote: > That's not the issue. the 386 kernel is the default, and is what I've been > running. The desire for a 686 non-SMP kernel is to determine if the > problem is with the 686 optimizations or the SMP code. > WHat I really want is for someone with knowledge of the kernel internals > to look at Paul's patches and see if they're appropriate to apply to the > current 686smp kernel source. I'm not a C programmer, and I haven't even > configured and compiled a kernel since it went modular, so I don't trust > my own opinion on the subject...
How about booting the 686 kernel with the nosmp on the boot command line? As for the patch, it's _way_ too invasive to even consider for dapper. If you want, you can try the Edgy Knot-3 LiveCD to see if it fixes your problem. -- Fail to boot smp kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/24533 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
