For SRU purposes, you can verify this changed against juju via the
following:

juju bootstrap --debug lxd (or any provider you wish)

Confirm the following from the output:

1. Bootstrap completes successfully
2. Agent is used from stream
Look for something similar to:
juju.environs.bootstrap bootstrap.go:621 picked bootstrap agent binary version: 
2.2.5
Fetching agent: curl -sSfw 'tools from %{url_effective} downloaded: HTTP 
%{http_code}; time %{time_total}s; size %{size_download} bytes; speed 
%{speed_download} bytes/s ' --retry 10 -o $bin/tools.tar.gz 
<[https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/agent/2.2.5/juju-2.2.5-ubuntu-amd64.tgz]>

We don't want to see 
juju.cmd.juju.commands bootstrap.go:496 failed to bootstrap model: no matching 
agent binaries available

or a note about juju uploading it's own agent.

3. default-series in metadata is xenial
Look for default-series in the config map. All options will be listed, but 
default-series is among them.
juju.cmd.juju.commands bootstrap.go:988 preparing controller with config: 
map[....image-metadata-url: ... default-series:xenial ...]

** Summary changed:

- no matching agent binaries available with 2.2.5
+ Juju attempts to bootstrap bionic by default

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727355

Title:
  Juju attempts to bootstrap bionic by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1727355/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to