11:01   Laney   goodnight!
11:01   jackpot51       Ok, good night Laney
11:12   didrocks        jackpot51: mind toning a little bit done please?
11:12   didrocks        jackpot51: you are quite offensive in that bug report
11:13   didrocks        and proposing a patch that you even didn't test it 
doesn't really pledge your saying
11:14   jackpot51       I know I screwed up, and I am sorry. But I don't want 
to have our amount of maintenance increased significantly because of a 
hardcoded GDM theme. For the short term, I can override the gnome-shell 
package, but it is not good for release
11:14   didrocks        jackpot51: does it justify this tone?
11:14   jackpot51       Building on gnome-shell on a new Artful installation is 
breaking, so I have to wait for the launchpad build to test changes.
11:15   jackpot51       No, it does not. I apologize for being offensive
11:15   didrocks        ok, better ground (not really fancy having this kind of 
discussion on Friday at 7:15PM)
11:15   didrocks        so, if I have the certainty you will work on a longer 
term solution, alternatives is ok
11:16   didrocks        (as the other solution I gave)
11:16   didrocks        I just don't want that we keep this for the LTS
11:17   didrocks        does it make sense? If so, please test the patch 
(especially lock screen-wise, that's the part I'm unsure if you install 2 
sessions with different lock screen theme, which one will be picked)
11:17   didrocks        and if you tell me it's good, I can sponsor it on Monday
11:17   didrocks        (after a final round of testing ofc)
11:18   jackpot51       What happened was that user-theme stopped working the 
day of feature freeze for us, leading to a cascade of theming changes we had to 
do. This culminated in theming GDM by replacing the ubuntu.css file, which 
broke my ability to use ubuntu-session. I like to see all three sessions 
(Ubuntu, Pop, and GNOME) for testing, so I only wanted a way to keep them all 
installed while having the GDM theme we had designed. That is all. We are in a 
scramble to get things fixed in a sane way, allowing us to release an ISO with 
our own theming. I am very sorry for out of line, I have misinterpreted 
messages from others and gone overboard.
11:18   didrocks        but again, I don't want to carry the patch post-17.10. 
I think there is a very good opportunity for cooperating inside GNOME to have 
those easily themeable (Shell, GDM)
11:18   didrocks        jackpot51: maybe your company could have talk or even 
help us within ubuntu itself to get things prepared
11:19   didrocks        and we could have cooperated, things were discussed :)
11:20   jackpot51       I agree. I am here, always, with an IRC bouncer. I have 
been following the ubuntu-devel mailing list, which is where I first saw the 
gnome-shell changes. Other members of our community are present here.
11:21   didrocks        come participate and ask during our meeting on 
#ubuntu-desktop, and work within ubuntu rather than a derivative, that will 
help your case being taken into account :)
11:21   jackpot51       I also want to have a good way for all GDM instances on 
all distributions to have the GDM look and feel configured
11:22   didrocks        jackpot51: so, on that one, do we agree with the 
timeline? You test the patch (especially lock-screen wise), if all +1 (tell it 
on the bug report), I will sponsor this on Monday, and then, we work together 
inside GNOME to get the proper fix before the LTS
11:22   jackpot51       I, however, feel there is a systemic issue in the 
Ubuntu community of not working with people like myself, who are outsiders 
trying to make their way into the community
11:23   didrocks        I'm unsure about the "trying to make their way", I've 
never seen you participate on our desktop meetings for instance
11:23   didrocks        where we have external contributors like jbicha and 
others
11:23   jackpot51       I have written patches for ubiquity, wpa, gnome initial 
setup, gnome control center, and others. Some have been merged, most have been 
ignored
11:23   didrocks        jackpot51: same in any projects unfortunately, I have 
multiple patches ignored and staying in GNOME bug tracker for years…
11:24   didrocks        jackpot51: but you are on IRC, so you can comment and 
ping on relevant channels, this is your added value :)
11:24   jackpot51       For example, here is a (fully tested) patch for 
Encrypted Home, something that I was actually present in the Ubuntu Desktop 
meeting discussing a desire for it: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1699216
···
Bug #1699216 “Encrypted home support” : Bugs : accountsservice package : Ubuntu
In the CreateUser D-bus call, allow the home directory of the new user to be 
encrypted.
11:24   didrocks        (and #ubuntu-desktop is a good one for those kind of 
topics)
11:24   ubottu  Launchpad bug 1699216 in gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu) 
"Encrypted home support" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
11:24   didrocks        yeah, this has been discussed multiple times on 
#ubuntu-desktop
11:25   jackpot51       Now, all I am asking for is *to not have our 
distribution broken by upstream*
11:25   didrocks        I don't really know more but seen it discussed (as I 
don't have expertise in accountservice)
11:25   didrocks        jackpot51: working inside ubuntu would have helped 
prevented that, or at least communicating on IRC and asking for our plans
11:25   jackpot51       I WAS HERE
11:26   jackpot51       I was on #ubuntu-desktop and I talked with people about 
this patch
11:26   jackpot51       I was on the mailing list
11:26   jackpot51       I was on launchpad
11:26   jackpot51       I subscribed ubuntu-sponsors
11:26   jackpot51       I provided a debdiff
11:26   didrocks        about the GNOME Shell one?
11:26   jackpot51       No, the encrypted home one
11:26   didrocks        you are telling "all I am asking for is *to not have 
our distribution broken by upstream*"
11:26   didrocks        I was answering on that one
11:26   jackpot51       This one is different, the implementation details, not 
the high level details, hit us by surprise
11:26   didrocks        I don't know about the other one and the state of it
11:27   didrocks        ok, anyway, we have a plan for the gdm theming, right?
11:27   jackpot51       Yes, I believe so
11:28   didrocks        I guess it's going to work at least for 17.10
11:28   didrocks        we'll then get the better solution, where I hope 
system76 will help GNOME upstream to get this done
11:28   didrocks        and we'll revisit
11:29   jackpot51       That is good to hear. I will be communicating with 
GNOME upstream, opening a bug on their tracker and talking on their IRC, to do 
the right thing
11:29   didrocks        good :)
11:29   jackpot51       Sorry about my mistakes on the patch earlier, and about 
the time-criticality of this patch
11:30   didrocks        no worry, I can understand patch not being fully 
fledge, I accept less the tone though
11:30   didrocks        (and we all live on deadlines :p)
11:30           didrocks really goes on week-end now
11:31   jackpot51       True that
11:31   jackpot51       Have a good weekend didrocks
11:31   didrocks        thanks, you too! and let's catch up on Monday jackpot51 
:)
11:31   jackpot51       Sure thing!


** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #787454
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787454

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715722

Title:
  Allow safe override of GDM3 theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1715722/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to