Yeah, the Windows ones are supposed to be (channel, target, lun) or (controller, target, lun).
I would have thought logically they would all have the same controller, but maybe SATA is handled differently. (0,0,0), (0,1,0), and (1,0,0) would map well to IDE primary master, IDE primary slave, IDE secondary master. Perhaps that's what it's doing as part of the legacy/PATA emulation? The addresses in Windows are almost certainly pretend ones. Maybe we get different results depending on whether we enumerate the devices via the BIOS or the SATA controller? -- grub guessed BIOS disk order incorrectly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8497 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
