** Description changed:

- libopenjpeg should be included in main because compiling poppler with
+ openjpeg should be included in main because compiling poppler with
  --enable-openjpeg in debian/rules gives poppler greater functionality
  (please see bug 710412). Since this change to /debian/rules adds
- libopenjpeg as a build-dep to poppler, which is in main, libopenjpeg
- must also be in main.
+ openjpeg as a build-dep to poppler, which is in main, openjpeg must also
+ be in main.
  
- ImageMagick also needs openjpeg in main so it can be built with JPEG2000
- support. (LP: #1447968)
+ ImageMagick also needs openjpeg in main so it can be built with JPEG2000 
support.
+  (LP: #1447968)
  
  Main inclusion requirements:
  
- 1. It is already in the universe.
+ 1. It is already in universe.
  
- 2. The package is a new build-dep, and has a large user base (think
+ 2. The package is a new build-dep and has a large user base (think
  evince).
  
- 3. Searching http://secunia.com/advisories/search/ for libopenjpeg gave
- zero results.
+ 3. Searching
+ https://secuniaresearch.flexerasoftware.com/community/advisories/search/
+ for openjpeg gave zero results.
  
- 4. Libopenjpeg has no current Ubuntu bugs 
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/openjpeg)
-      in the Debian bug tracking system libopenjpeg has 1 open bug 
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=libopenjpeg2), this is an 
encoding bug, but the main use for this package will be decoding.
-      Libopenjpeg does not require any configuration or debconf questions.
+ 4. openjpeg has no current Ubuntu bugs
+ (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2)
+ 
+    Debian bugs at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
+ bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=openjpeg2
+ 
+    openjpeg does not require any configuration or debconf questions.
  
  5. N/A
  
  6. All build-deps are already included in main.
  
- 7. I am afraid that this is a bit over my head, hopefully someone else
- could ensure that this package meets the requirments here. Based on its
- long inclusion in Debian and Ubuntu I think that it should be alright
+ 7. I am afraid that this is a bit over my head. Hopefully, someone else
+ could ensure that this package meets the requirements here. Based on its
+ long inclusion in Debian and Ubuntu, I think that it should be alright
  here.
  
- 8.This is a fairly simple program not needed too much maintenance, as
- shown by the bug reports.
+ 8. This is a fairly simple program that doesn't need too much
+ maintenance as shown by the bug reports.
  
  9. The package title and description seem to be in order.
- 
- My only final comments are that I am sorry this may not be quite the
- normal MIR, but I am just a member of bug control, not a dev. Also, any
- help and advise along the way would be much appreciated.

** Description changed:

  openjpeg should be included in main because compiling poppler with
  --enable-openjpeg in debian/rules gives poppler greater functionality
  (please see bug 710412). Since this change to /debian/rules adds
  openjpeg as a build-dep to poppler, which is in main, openjpeg must also
  be in main.
  
  ImageMagick also needs openjpeg in main so it can be built with JPEG2000 
support.
-  (LP: #1447968)
+  (LP: #1447968)
  
  Main inclusion requirements:
  
  1. It is already in universe.
  
  2. The package is a new build-dep and has a large user base (think
  evince).
  
  3. Searching
  https://secuniaresearch.flexerasoftware.com/community/advisories/search/
  for openjpeg gave zero results.
  
  4. openjpeg has no current Ubuntu bugs
  (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2)
  
-    Debian bugs at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
+ Debian bugs at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
  bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=openjpeg2
  
-    openjpeg does not require any configuration or debconf questions.
+ openjpeg does not require any configuration or debconf questions.
  
  5. N/A
  
  6. All build-deps are already included in main.
  
  7. I am afraid that this is a bit over my head. Hopefully, someone else
  could ensure that this package meets the requirements here. Based on its
  long inclusion in Debian and Ubuntu, I think that it should be alright
  here.
  
  8. This is a fairly simple program that doesn't need too much
  maintenance as shown by the bug reports.
  
  9. The package title and description seem to be in order.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711061

Title:
  [MIR] openjpeg2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2/+bug/711061/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to