------- Comment From amo...@au1.ibm.com 2017-01-29 22:25 EDT-------
I think both e4aa8a9 ("PowerPC64 ELFv1 undefined weak functions") and 7f27ccfc
("PR 20472, PowerPC64 ifunc confusion") should be left off 2.26 based binutils.
While the undefined weak fix is desirable, it broke ifunc and the
followup fix for ifunc dynamic relocation accounting confusion requires
other infrastructure changes that are not on 2.26. The backports
necessary are large enough that I think it would be better to simply
require 2.27 if we really want undefined weak to be fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655181
Title:
P9 support in binutils
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1655181/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
