On the suggested fix: Why even keep the printf? Why not switch to just print?
I'm not a C expert by any means, but shouldn't
printf("%s", <something returning a string>)
be completely equivalent to
print(<something returning a string>)
With the exception that the second one should be very slightly less overhead?-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644048 Title: 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 only with format-security error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1644048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
