On 2016-10-28 23:01, Nathanaël Naeri wrote: > Gunnar: >> As regards dependencies in Ubuntu, I don't think it's possible to >> let a package in universe/multiverse recommend or depend on a >> package in Canonical Partner, since the latter is not enabled by >> default. > > I thought so too, but now I'm not sure it's that much of a problem, > as long as a fallback is in place.
Well, when working with bug #1633678 I tested it and changed my mind. The proposal there does not include a fallback, and the package system seems to handle it fine. Btw, Your remark about the recommends of ubuntu-restricted-addons was interesting considering a post I made to the ubuntu-devel mailing list earlier today: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2016-October/039529.html (I posted a correction afterwards, so if you read that message, please read the whole thread.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632870 Title: Package is broken since Google stopped shipping Flash with Chrome 54 for Linux To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1632870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
