Was this tested on arm64 please? I feel we should. What if, for example, numa support is completely broken on arm64 and this is why it was disabled? By landing this, we could be regressing arm64 support if we don't test it.
Please test (or confirm tested) on arm64 and then mark v-d. ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-needed ** Description changed: [Impact] The host capabilities for arm64 NUMA systems are incomplete - one effect of which is that nova is unable to make use of hugetlbfs for backing VMs with huge pages. [Test Case] Examine the output of 'virsh capabilities' on an arm64 NUMA system. The topology section for all but the first node are currently inaccurate and lacks page size entries. Sample output from a 2-node NUMA system is attached, both pre and post fix. [Regression Risk] Risk is minimized by the fact that this change is just enabling the same code for arm64 that is already enabled for the other NUMA-enabled Ubuntu architectures. + + [racb] What if, for example, numa support is completely broken on arm64 + and this is why it was disabled? By landing this, we could be regressing + arm64 support. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627926 Title: Enable NUMA support in arm64 builds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1627926/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
