Ok, I've read other discussions on the gnome bug tracker. Not going to
surrender :) Sorry for causing trouble here, but I really think I am
seeing a mistake in gnome, and would like to see it corrected. So let me
summarize the two most important points that have been overlooked, apart
from personal preferences and impressions.

 Sebastian: you asked: "what is your issue with having the close button
closing an application?". Issue is, I would prefer the close button to
close a window, not an application. If usually, and for very good
reasons, application and window coincide (and I know this is part of the
HIG), the systray is exactly an exception. The systray is a mean to
represent an "application" as a separate entity from the windows it
created.

But, more important: current policy violates the HIG. You manipulate an
object (the window) and end up deleting another object (the tray icon).
The HIG principle I mention here has been considered so important in the
history of gnome, that we can't have a damn "panel properties" menu
entry, in the menu of panel items. I  remember the discussion when I
still used gnome 1.2 in debian potato. This leads to various usability
problems, especially when you have a full panel and you can't open the
context menu of your panel, but we had to accept these usability
problems just because acting on an object should not act on other
visible objects. Now I really don't see why you should violate this
principle, and don't see what other principles would be violated by
letting the close action on a window do what you asked for, which is,
"close the window, please".

-- 
Window close should close, not quit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38512
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to