I believe that's because that one was suggested in some scanbd documentation.
-- Kind Regards, Sander Devrieze. Op 4 mrt. 2015 06:40 schreef "Rolf Leggewie" <[email protected]>: > BTW, is there a reason you are suggesting inetutils-inetd in #6? > openbds-inetd seems to enjoy the much wider adoption. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216385 > > Title: > [needs-packaging] scanbd > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scanbd/+bug/1216385/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216385 Title: [needs-packaging] scanbd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scanbd/+bug/1216385/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
