On 15/01/2015 17:23, RJVB wrote:
> On Thursday January 15 2015 16:10:18 DaanS wrote:
>> Minor update:
>> Somewhere between rL201729 and RELEASE_350/final, the fix was changed to:
>> #if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L || __cplusplus >= 201103L
>>
>>
>>
>> #if !defined(__CLANG_MAX_ALIGN_T_DEFINED) || __has_feature(modules)
>>
>>
>>
>> #ifndef _MSC_VER
>>
>>
>>
>> typedef struct {
>>
>>
>>
>> long long __clang_max_align_nonce1
>>
>>
>>
>> __attribute__((__aligned__(__alignof__(long long))));
>>
>>
>>
>> long double __clang_max_align_nonce2
>>
>>
>>
>> __attribute__((__aligned__(__alignof__(long double))));
>>
>>
>>
>> } max_align_t;
>>
>>
>>
>> #else
>>
>>
>>
>> typedef double max_align_t;
>>
>>
>>
>> #endif
>>
>>
>>
>> #define __CLANG_MAX_ALIGN_T_DEFINED
>>
>>
>>
>> #endif
>>
>>
>>
>> #endif
>
> #> clang --version
> Ubuntu clang version 3.5.0-8~debiansid-rjvb-ppa20141214
> (tags/RELEASE_350/final) (based on LLVM 3.5.0)
>
> Is rL201729 more recent than that final 350 release? If not, is there
> any reason to spend the time updating my PPA (even if launchpad does the
> heavy lifting it still is a considerable chunk of work)?
>
I don't really know, sorry :/FYI, I uploaded 3.5.1 in Debian experimental. a 3.5.2 will come. Sylvestre -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1401202 Title: clang-3.5 fails to compile C++11 files after installing gcc-4.9 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-snapshot/+bug/1401202/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
