On 11/09/2007, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How did this happen in the first place? Was the some reason for this?
Yes, a number of reasons. 1. We didn't (and still don't) have the appropriate toolchain to convert our documentation to moin markup. I've recently been playing around with the best tools that we have to do this, and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MatthewEast/Test is the result. A few things to iron out but hopefully with a bit of work we can tidy this up. 2. The above isn't really a fundamental objection, given that Moin can quite easily support HTML pages. However, we have not currently got a solid way to distinguish between different levels of reliability in the wiki, so there's no way to tell users "this page is the good stuff, you can trust it", and "this page hasn't been verified, follow with caution", and the various different grades in between. We're working on this at the following specification: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpWikiQualityAssurance. -- Matthew East http://www.mdke.org gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF -- Eye Candy page not easily accessible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
