"Is it OK to drop the leaf-net and unconfined components from the path?
Currently, a confined scope relies on being able to create the final
path component *itself* by calling mkdir(). So, assuming that
~/.local/share/unity-scopes/leaf-net exists, the scope will try to
create ~/.local/share/unity-scopes/leaf-net/@{APP_PKG_NAME}."
No. This is important for isolation between scopes if we ever decide to
support other scope templates to protect against certain types of
attacks via differently versioned apps.
** Also affects: click-reviewers-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: click-reviewers-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: click-reviewers-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: click-reviewers-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384286
Title:
add directory allowing scopes and apps to share data
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu/+bug/1384286/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
