I'm afraid I must confirm this too (Xfce, Trusty 14.04, gThumb 3.2.7). I too see a definite difference between large and small files/ photo loading time on 3 different machines with various capabilities (from i7 with 32GB to 2 Intel Atom dual with 1GB notebook). Hence, I switched for my photo browsing to Ristretto.
However, I also seem to see a big difference in loading times between images with, and images without full META data (e.g. camara make, exposure times, flash on/off, ISO). Is that just me or do others also have this experience? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307127 Title: Too slow to use, and feature missing! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gthumb/+bug/1307127/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
